Valiant or Contentious? Learning the Difference from the Life of Christ
In today’s culture, we often treat any discomfort as contention. If a conversation feels tense, if a truth stings, or if a correction disrupts the status quo, we assume someone has been “contentious.”
But scripture paints a very different picture.
Christ Himself was often direct, confrontational, and uncompromising—yet never contentious.
And modern prophets teach that disciples must be valiant in the testimony of Jesus, not passive, fearful, or silent. 1
This post explores the difference between contention and valiant testimony, using Christ’s own ministry as the model.
What Contention Actually Is (and Isn’t)
LDS scripture is unambiguous:
- “He that hath the spirit of contention is not of me” (3 Nephi 11:29).
- Contention is anger‑driven, ego‑driven, and adversarial.
- It seeks to win, not to heal.
- It springs from pride, not love.
But confrontation—truth spoken clearly, boldly, and lovingly—is not only allowed but required of disciples.
Elder Quentin L. Cook taught that eternal life is denied to those “who are not valiant in the testimony of Jesus”.
Valiance requires courage, clarity, and conviction—not silence.
Christ’s Life: Confrontational Moments That Would Be Condemned Today
If we stripped the names from many of Christ’s actions, modern audiences would likely label Him as:
- harsh
- judgmental
- unkind
- divisive
- “not Christlike”
Yet these moments were pure expressions of divine love and truth.
Below are key examples, paired with LDS teachings that illuminate why they were righteous—not contentious.
1. Cleansing the Temple
Christ’s action: Driving out money changers, overturning tables (Matthew 21).
Modern reaction: “He’s being aggressive and causing a scene.”
LDS teaching:
Alma’s bold preaching led many to repentance, not contention. (Alma 29)
Christ’s act was a call to repentance, protecting the poor and restoring holiness.
2. Rebuking the Pharisees
Christ’s action: Calling them “hypocrites,” “blind guides,” and “whitewashed tombs” (Matthew 23).
Modern reaction: “He’s attacking people and being judgmental.”
LDS teaching:
“Say nothing but repentance unto this generation” (D&C 6:9; 11:9).
Christ’s rebuke was a doctrinal correction, not a personal attack.
3. “Get Thee Behind Me, Satan” — Rebuking Peter
Christ’s action: A sharp correction of a beloved disciple (Matthew 16:23).
Modern reaction: “That’s shaming and emotionally unsafe.”
Paired LDS teaching:
“Let your sins trouble you… unto repentance.” (Alma 42:29)
Christ’s correction redirected Peter toward God’s will.
4. Hard Teachings That Offended Followers
Christ’s action: Teaching doctrine so difficult that “many walked no more with Him” (John 6).
Modern reaction: “He’s being insensitive and rigid.”
Paired LDS teaching:
“Every man must repent or suffer” (D&C 19:4).
Christ prioritized truth over popularity.
5. Correcting His Disciples Publicly
Christ’s action: “O ye of little faith,” “Why are ye fearful?” (Matthew 8:26)
Modern reaction: “He embarrassed them.”
Paired LDS teaching:
“He who confesses and forsakes his sins is forgiven” (D&C 58:42–43).
Christ’s corrections were formative, not punitive.
6. Confronting False Teachers
Christ’s action: Exposing doctrinal error and spiritual abuse. (John 8:44, Matthew 15:7-9, Luke 11:39-52)
Modern reaction: “He’s divisive.”
Paired LDS teaching:
“Repent, all ye ends of the earth” (3 Nephi 27:20).
Christ’s confrontation protected the flock.
Valiant Testimony vs. Contention: The Real Difference
Elder Cook taught that stumbling blocks can confuse and complicate our testimony, but disciples must remain valiant—clear, simple, and unwavering in their witness of Christ.
Here’s the key distinction:
 |
Christ’s ministry shows that boldness is not the enemy of Christlike love.
Pride is.
Why This Matters Today
We live in a time when:
- truth is often softened to avoid offense
- correction is labeled as judgment
- bold testimony is mistaken for contention
- disciples fear being disliked more than being unfaithful
But Christ’s life teaches that love sometimes looks like courage, not comfort.
Being valiant in the testimony of Jesus means:
- speaking truth even when unpopular
- calling for repentance when needed
- defending doctrine with clarity
- refusing to dilute the gospel to avoid discomfort
This is not contention.
This is discipleship.
Conclusion: Christ Shows Us the Way
Christ was never contentious—but He was often confrontational.
He was never cruel—but He was piercingly honest.
He was never prideful—but He was unwavering in truth.
To follow Him, we must learn the same balance.
As Elder Cook taught, we cannot afford to let stumbling blocks confuse our testimony.
We must be valiant—clear, courageous, and Christlike.
Not silent.
Not passive.
Not afraid.
Valiant.
The last few years have taught me something unexpected: most of my spiritual pushback doesn’t come from outside the Church, but from within it. In the long months between conferences, I often hear that I’m misunderstanding doctrine, being too direct, or stirring up contention simply by trying to speak plainly about truth. It can feel disorienting — even a little like gaslighting — when what I’m sharing is met with suspicion instead of discernment. And yet, conference arrives, and the very principles I’ve been trying to articulate are reaffirmed with clarity and authority. Those moments steady me. They remind me that being valiant isn’t the same as being contentious, and that standing for truth will sometimes feel lonely before it feels confirmed.
ReplyDelete